CM Yadav told ANI, "The decision taken by the Varanasi District Court in the Gyanvapi case is a milestone decision...I want to congratulate the court...the ASI (Archaeological Survey of India) report itself indicating in whose favour the decision should be."
In its plea filed by Vishnu Shankar Jain, the Hindu side advocate has asked the top court to allow the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to carry out another comprehensive survey in the 'wazukhana' area without harming the 'Shivling'.
Reacting to the Archaeological Survey of India's report on the Gyanvapi Case, Advocate Hari Shankar Jain on Friday asserted that report clearly stated that a temple "existed" at the site of Gyanvapi mosque and urged the government to declare it a "national monument."
Hours after the Varanasi district court on Wednesday directed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report be made public, advocate Hari Shankar Jain, the counsel for the Hindu side, claimed that "there is evidence to show that the mandir was demolished to make way for the construction of
The Varanasi district Court on Wednesday asked that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report be made public today and the hard copy be provided to both sides.
Speaking to ANI Pathak said, "We are praying to God that our report be submitted today. The further course of action will begin only when the report is submitted. We want the process to begin at the earliest. The survey of the 'Shivling' found in Wazukhana also be done."
Amid the ongoing survey of the Gyanvapi complex by Archaeological Survey of India, advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi case on Tuesday said that a fresh plea has been submitted in the district court Varanasi seeking the handover of the basement of Gyanvap
The advocate Anupam Dwivedi representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi case on Thursday informed that Varanasi district court has directed Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to prepare a list and preserve all objects found in the scientific survey of the complex.
The next hearing on the petitions challenging the maintainability of the civil suit filed with regard to the ownership of the Varanasi Gyanvapi complex and the validity of the Allahabad High Court ordering a survey by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), was scheduled for September 1