The reserved verdict was announced by Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ), Islamabad, Humayun Dilawar with the hearing set to take place on July 12. The witnesses have also been summoned on the same day.
Reacting to the Gujarat High Court verdict on the defamation case against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Union Minister V Muraleedharan said that Rahul Gandhi and the Congress should apologize to the people in the Wayanad Lok Sabha constituency as they are bereft of an MP after his disqualifi
Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister and Congress workers also held a protest in Bengaluru, against the Gujarat High Court verdict on the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi.
"This is a big conspiracy of BJP...BJP with its party cadre has filed a complaint and a verdict has come on it, such a verdict has never come...nobody can stop the Gandhi family and Rahul Gandhi," DK Shivkumar said.
Expressing his dissatisfaction over the Gujarat High Court's order on Rahul Gandhi's plea, former Union Law Minister Ashwani Kumar on Friday said that the court's verdict denying a stay on the Congress leader's conviction in the 'Modi Surname' case is saddening for the entire country.
Shortly after the Gujarat High Court on Friday declined to grant a stay of Rahul Gandhi's conviction in a case involving a defamatory statement about the "Modi surname, Congress treasurer Pawan Bansal said that the Congress respects the court's verdict but does not agree with the judgement.
Addressing a press conference in the national capital, Prasad said, "We would like to ask Congress, why can't you control Rahul Gandhi? Why can't you train him to speak properly? He is your leader."
Gujarat High Court on Friday upheld Sessions Court's order denying stay on the conviction of Rahul Gandhi in the defamation case against 'Modi surname' remark
Gujarat High Court will pronounce the judgement on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's plea seeking a stay on his conviction in the 'Modi surname' defamation case on July 7.
After a division bench of the Madras High Court gave a split verdict on the habeas corpus plea filed by the wife of Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji for his release in a case registered by Directorate of Enforcement (ED), the Supreme Court on Tuesday requested the Chief Justice of Hig
The split verdict was delivered by a division bench of Justices Nisha Banu and D Bharatha Chakravarthy. While Nisha Banu concluded that the habeas corpus plea filed for Balaji's release is maintainable and therefore be allowed, Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy said he could not agree with