New Delhi [India], June 20: The pending cases in India have reached over 5 crores, underscoring the prevailing challenges in the judicial system. The high volume of cases leads to extended resolution times. Even with the introduction of reformative measures such as setting up fast-track cour
"There are some shortcomings in the NCERT textbook about the Babri Masjid issue. They do not mention how the three-domed structure was removed on December 6, 1992, they are only starting to narrate the issue from November 9, 2019, when the Ayodhya verdict was given," Satyendra Das Maharaj
According to details, the judicial magistrate Malik Muhammad Imran announced the reserved verdict and Imran Khan, Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Awami Muslim League (AML) chief Sheikh Rasheed.
Naidu was unanimously elected leader of the NDA Legislative Party. The MLAs-elect of all the three alliance partners met at a private function hall on Tuesday morning to elect their leader where the Jana Sena chief, Pawan Kalyan, proposed the name of Chandrababu to lead the NDA in the Sta
Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Monday said that the recent verdict in the General elections was a warning bell and added that it warranted a course correction.
The BJP-led NDA is set to form its third successive government at the Centre with the Lok Sabha election results on Tuesday throwing up a verdict that also brought cheer to the opposition INDIA bloc as it put up a strong performance with Congress almost touching the 100-seat mark
The Supreme Court will hear the pleas of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia challenging the Delhi High Court verdict rejecting his bail pleas in cases lodged by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connect
IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb announced the verdict after accepting the appeals of Imran Khan and Shah Mahmood Qureshi against their convictions in the cypher case.
Biden also characterised Trump's claims as "reckless," "dangerous," and "irresponsible," warning against undermining the integrity of the judicial system simply because one disagrees with the verdict.