Michael L. Ross and his colleagues examined the role of political leaders, including presidents, prime ministers, and monarchs, in raising taxes on and reducing subsidies for gasoline.
The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed Mohammed Tahir Hussain's plea challenging the Delhi High Court's order of refusing to stay the proceedings in some FIRs registered against him.
Lieutenant Governor (LG) VK Saxena recommended the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for initiating disciplinary proceedings against IAS officer SM Ali for allowing illegal resolutions of the Delhi Waqf Board (DWB).
A petitioner and his advocate, who had filed a petition against a Karnataka High Court judgement in the Supreme Court, were slapped with a contempt notice by the apex court for using the derogatory remarks against the judges.
During the course of enquiries, it was found that exported quantity was more than the quantity on which royalty was paid and there was underreporting of quantity while exporting. In many instances, the agency said the export proceeds were not realised in the declared bank accounts, thereby,
Advocate Prashant Patil lawyer for Jacqueline Fernandez while talking to ANI confirmed that she (Jacqueline Fernandez) will attend the court proceedings scheduled for Thursday.
It was alleged that the accused in conspiracy with unknown officials of State Bank of India had cheated the Bank to the tune of Rs 87.88 crore (total amount with interest of around Rs 121.13 crore) during the period from 2006 till 2019 by illegally removing machinery and other parts without
In a sensational development, Businessman Dinesh Arora, an accused in the Delhi excise policy case, said that he is ready to make true disclosure voluntarily with respect to his role in the commission of the alleged offences.
The former cricketer also sought compensation of Rs 100 crore from the officer for making match-fixing allegations against him. The case was listed on Friday, however, it could not be heard and is likely to be heard on Tuesday.
The petitioner/DK Shivakumar contends that the ED in the impugned proceedings is re-investigating the same offence which it had already investigated in a previous case lodged by it in ECIR 2018. The impugned proceedings have been initiated in complete abuse of process of law and mala fide ex