The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notice to the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) on a writ petition filed by two petitioners, the highest bidders for an industrial plot in the Mega Food Park at IMT Rohtak.
The Supreme Court has sought the Election Commission of India's (ECI) response to a batch of pleas filed by various petitioners including the Kerala government challenging the ECI's decision to carry out Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise of the voter roll in the Kerala.
The top court, after hearing the Centre's submissions, directed the petitioners, the father of deceased Captain Sumit Sabharwal and the NGO Safety Matters Foundation, to file their counter-affidavits responding to the government's position.
A Division Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela made the remarks while hearing two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) that sought to restrain the release of the movie, alleging that it misrepresents historical facts and could disturb communal harmony.
The complainant confirmed in the court that her decision to settle the matter is voluntary and made without any undue influence or coercion. She further confirms the receipt of the entire settlement amount from the Petitioners, as per the terms of the Compromise. A deed was executed betwe
During the hearing, the petitioners argued that the poll panel must publish separate lists of voters who were deleted and those who were newly added. The apex court observed that the poll panel is aware of its responsibility to disclose the voter data upon completion of the recently concl
The Supreme Court has approved the Union Public Service Commission's (UPSC) proposal to publish provisional answer keys immediately after the Civil Services Preliminary Examination and invite objections from candidates before finalising results a landmark reform that ends decades of resis
Justice Saurabh Banerjee observed that the petitioners had made "flimsy, misleading and mythical assertions" against a sitting trial court judge without any credible material to substantiate their claims.
The petitioners, including several hotel associations, had challenged the levy of a uniform Use Factor (UF-10) and the maximum 20 per cent tax rate, arguing that the classification of hotels on the basis of voluntary star ratings lacked statutory backing and unfairly burdened establishments
"We are not persuaded to accept the contention that inviting a person of a different faith to inaugurate the event violates the legal or constitutional rights of the petitioners," the court observed.
Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, member of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board and a petitioner, said that many of the points raised, including issues related to "Waqf by User" and protection of monuments, have been accepted by the court.
The court also imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the state, observing that the petitioners had been "unnecessarily dragged into litigation" and had served the college without pay since June 2021.