Addressing a press conference in the national capital, Prasad said, "We would like to ask Congress, why can't you control Rahul Gandhi? Why can't you train him to speak properly? He is your leader."
Gujarat High Court will pronounce the judgement on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's plea seeking a stay on his conviction in the 'Modi surname' defamation case on July 7.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Wednesday a plea by activist Teesta Setalvad challenging the Gujarat high court order which had rejected her plea for regular bail and directed her to surrender immediately in a case of the alleged fabrication of evidence in relation to the 2002 Guja
The Supreme Court granted interim protection to social activist Teesta Setalvad, whose regular bail was rejected by the Gujarat High Court today in a case of alleged fabrication of evidence in relation to the 2002 Gujarat riots. High Court had asked her to surrender immediately.
In a special sitting, a three-judge bench of Justices BR Gavai, AS Bopanna and Dipankar Datta to hear at 9.15 pm plea of social activist Teesta Setalvad against the Gujarat High Court order rejecting her regular bail plea in a case of alleged fabrication of evidence in relation to the 2002 G
Social activist Teesta Setalvad could not get any relief from the Supreme Court on Saturday as the bench of two judges differed on granting interim protection to her, after she approached the apex court when the Gujarat High Court today rejected her regular bail plea in a case of alleged fab
Gujarat High Court will hear the Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's petition seeking a review of its order in a matter related to the degree of Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 7.
In his review petition, Kejriwal said the postgraduate degree of Modi was not available on the website of the university or elsewhere in the public domain as claimed by the university and as submitted by Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, who appeared on behalf of the university.
The matter pertains to the complaint lodged by activist Medha Patkar in 2002 against VK Saxena and three others accusing them of allegedly assaulting her.
The complainant, a married spa worker who has two children, stated that Ghanchi obtained her personal information under the pretence of referring additional clients.
CJI cited the recent clips of the Patna HC judge asking an IAS officer why he is not appropriately dressed or the Gujarat HC judge asking a lawyer why she is not prepared with her case are going around.