BRS leader K Kavitha on Thursday moved Rouse Avenue Court, seeking a direction to place on record the application or court order for her arrest by the CBI in Delhi Excise Policy case. She has been in judicial custody in a money laundering case related to the Delhi excise policy.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, while approaching the Supreme Court challenging a Delhi High Court judgement that dismissed his plea against arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) and his subsequent remand in the excise policy case, has contended in the appeal that his arrest af
Bansuri Swaraj, Bharatiya Janata Party candidate from New Delhi Lok Sabha constituency, alleged that the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has become a 'kickback to self' party.
The Rouse Avenue Court of Delhi on Wednesday dismissed the plea moved by the Delhi Chief Minister seeking direction to increase the number of Legal meetings with his lawyers from two to five times a week and said he has used the allotted legal meeting time for purposes other than legal in
The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday apprised the concerned court of Delhi that BRS leader K Kavitha has already been examined on April 6 in Tihar Jail in connection with excise policy case.
Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva, Leader of the Opposition in the Delhi Legislative Assembly Ramvir Singh Bidhur, Kapil Mishra and Shazia Ilmi were present at the protest site.
Through the plea, Kejriwal stated that as he is facing multiple FIRs in various states, a lot of legal work takes place and hence the number of meetings should be increased.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court's dismissal of the plea challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the excise policy case.
The bench of Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma on Tuesday while dismissing Kejriwal's plea made strong observations and said Kejriwal was not summoned for the first time after the General Elections were declared in India or the Model Code of Conduct came into existence, but the first summons wa
"Had the petitioner joined the investigation pursuant to the issuance of summons under Section 50 of PMLA," asked the court, adding that he could have given his version before the investigating agency against the material that it had collected.