Expressing his dissatisfaction over the Gujarat High Court's order on Rahul Gandhi's plea, former Union Law Minister Ashwani Kumar on Friday said that the court's verdict denying a stay on the Congress leader's conviction in the 'Modi Surname' case is saddening for the entire country.
The Gujarat High Court on Friday refused to stay on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's plea seeking a stay on his conviction in the 'Modi surname' defamation case.
Shortly after the Gujarat High Court on Friday declined to grant a stay of Rahul Gandhi's conviction in a case involving a defamatory statement about the "Modi surname, Congress treasurer Pawan Bansal said that the Congress respects the court's verdict but does not agree with the judgement.
Addressing a press conference in the national capital, Prasad said, "We would like to ask Congress, why can't you control Rahul Gandhi? Why can't you train him to speak properly? He is your leader."
Gujarat High Court on Friday upheld Sessions Court's order denying stay on the conviction of Rahul Gandhi in the defamation case against 'Modi surname' remark
In a setback for Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Gujarat High Court on Monday upheld the Sessions Court's order and denied a stay on his conviction in the defamation case against 'Modi surname' remark
Gujarat High Court will pronounce the judgement on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's plea seeking a stay on his conviction in the 'Modi surname' defamation case on July 7.
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Harpreet Singh Jaspal said, "Having considered the facts and circumstances, the testimonies of the complainant witnesses, the evidence placed on record, it prima facie appears that the accused (Ashok Gehlot) has made specific defamatory stateme
Jharkhand High Court directed that no coercive action be taken against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in the Modi surname defamation case. The next hearing will be on August 16.
It was argued by the complainant the said allegations are false and frivolous and even the letter, as aforementioned, is false and somebody has forged the signatures of the complainant on the said letter.