The Lahore High Court on Saturday fixed a hearing for Imran Khan's petition against the Election Commission of Pakistan's move to remove him as the PTI chairman in the Toshakhana case, Dawn reported. A five-member larger bench headed by Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan will hear the plea on April
The Reserve Bank of India, in its first monetary policy review meeting in 2023-24, decided to keep the key benchmark interest rate - the repo rate - unchanged at 6.5 per cent, to assess the effects of the policy rate tightening done so far.
The Reserve Bank of India, in its first monetary policy review meeting in 2023-24, decided to keep the key benchmark interest rate - the repo rate - unchanged at 6.5 per cent.
The bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma rejected the bail plea of Satyender Jain, Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain. The bench while dismissed the Satyendar Jain bail plea stated that applicant is an influential person and has the potential of tampering with evidence. Satyender Jain/applicant
The bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma will pass judgement on April 6, 2023. The bench had kept the order reserved on March 21 after the conclusion of the submissions made by the defence and prosecution sides.
A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala directed that the matter shall be listed before a three-judge bench for a hearing in July.
Governor Shaktikanta Das will announce the outcome of the meetings at 10 in the morning, followed by a press conference at noon which would be telecast.
ASSOCHAM President Ajay Singh said, "Though India remains the fastest-growing nation amongst the major economies, growth is uneven even as the global headwinds from volatile energy prices, geo-political developments and threat of recession in major economies need to be watched with an abunda
The Madurai bench of Madras High Court on Monday directed the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) to come up with a scheme to ensure quick and hassle-free darshan for pregnant women and differently-abled persons in five major temples in Tamil Nadu.
The case was referred to a larger bench as there were differences of opinion between justices on the basic issue of whether the decisions taken by the cabinet can be subjected to investigation under the provisions of the Kerala Lokayukta Act, 1999 and the merits of the allegations.