The Supreme Court has propounded that the fundamental right of liberty provided under Article 21 of the Constitution is superior to the statutory restrictions and reiterated that the prolonged incarceration before being pronounced guilty of an offence should not be permitted to become pun
In a notable ruling, the Saket District Court has granted an accused individual permission to travel to the United Kingdom to visit his wife for procreation, underscoring the recognition of procreation as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
The Supreme Court on Friday expressed grave concern over tonnes of untreated solid waste in Delhi and noted no concrete solution seemed to be in sight until 2027 to treat 11,000 tonnes of solid waste generated in the national capital every day.
The Supreme Court on Monday expressed grave concern on Monday about the generation of 3,800 tonnes of untreated solid waste every day in the national capital and said it directly affects the fundamental right of the citizens under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution to live in a pollution-
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the police of all the States and Union Territories to ensure that no mechanical entries in history sheet are made of innocent individuals.
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been moved in Delhi High Court seeking direction to the Center to take steps to ensure that the travel companies, particularly the foreign travel companies, that collect personal data, i.e., name, address, phone number, AADHAAR, passport details, etc.,
Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI), the youth wing of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) on Tuesday approached the Supreme Court demanding to stay the implementation of CAA.
DYFI contended that granting citizenship based on the religion of immigrants offends the fundamental pri
The Supreme Court on Friday said that some parts of Calcutta High Court judgment that stated that adolescent girls must control their sexual urges instead of giving in to two minutes of pleasure "were highly objectionable and completely unwarranted".
"There were four separate judgements. The Chief Justice and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul together elucidated some very important sets of legal and jurisprudential principles. They said that there is no fundamental right to marriage but there are various aspects of the right to marriage locate
The Delhi High Court in an order granted protection to a couple that recently got married and belonged to different religion observing that "The choice to choose a life partner cannot in any way be affected by matters of faith and religion.”