"This case has been dug up, buried many times": RJD spokesperson on Delhi HC refusing to stay proceedings in land-for-jobs case

Patna (Bihar) [India], May 31 (ANI): After Delhi High Court dismissed RJD Chief Lalu Prasad Yadav's plea to stay the proceedings in the land-for-jobs case, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) spokesperson Shakti Singh Yadav on Saturday said that the party respects the court and cannot comment on the judicial decision.
"As per rules, we went to get a stay (in the case) in light of flaws found by advocates. However, the Delhi High Court has vehemently denied this. We don't want to comment on the judicial decision because we respect the court, but one thing is clear: this case has been dug up and buried many times," Yadav told ANI.
However, he said that the ruling government was constantly reopening this alleged 'land-for-jobs' corruption case and questioned the role of central probe agencies.
"The ruling government is reopening the case again and again...The role of agencies within this country is not hidden...(Some) institutions are also worried about their reputation. The politics of pressure have had a bad effect on the institutions as well as the investigating agencies," the RJD leader added.
Earlier, the Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea by RJD chief and former Railway Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav seeking to stay trial court proceedings in the alleged 'land-for-jobs' corruption case, investigated by the CBI.
Justice Ravinder Dudeja ruled that Yadav remains free to present his arguments before the trial court at the charge consideration stage, stating there were no compelling reasons to halt proceedings.
Represented by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, Yadav sought to quash the FIR, arguing that the CBI failed to obtain mandatory prior approval before proceeding with its inquiry. He contended that while approval was secured for others, it was not obtained in his case.
The trial court is scheduled to commence arguments on charge framing on June 2.
The CBI, opposing the petition on maintainability grounds, argued that sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act was not required. It further stated that while sanction under Section 19 was necessary, it had already been obtained.
The agency also informed the court that the issue raised is currently pending before the Supreme Court and is expected to be heard by a three-judge bench.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) are investigating former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, his family, and several others in connection with the land-for-jobs case. Yadav is alleged to have granted railway jobs in exchange for land parcels from candidates or their relatives, either as gifts or at significantly reduced prices. (ANI)