The Supreme Court on Wednesday hinted that it will soon hear and adjudicate a batch of pleas challenging the validity of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.
In a post on the social media platform X, Ramesh outlined the party's ongoing legal actions, stating that the party was already challenging several laws in the Supreme Court, including the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) of 2019, amendments to the Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005, a
A bench of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar granted the petitioner liberty to file an application in the pending challenge to the Act.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 1) will hear a plea challenging the validity of a provision of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, which preserves the character of religious places as they existed on August 15, 1947.
The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned for April the hearing of pleas filed challenging the validity Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, which preserves the character of religious places as they existed on August 15, 1947.
The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned the hearing of pleas filed challenging the validity Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, which preserves the character of religious places as they existed on August 15, 1947.
The Indian National Congress on Thursday moved the Supreme Court to intervene in cases filed against the validity Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, which preserves the character of religious places as they existed on August 15, 1947.
A Hindu outfit, the Akhil Bhartiya Sant Samiti, on Monday moved the Supreme Court seeking to intervene in cases filed against the validity Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, which preserves the character of religious places as they existed on August 15, 1947.
The Supreme Court on Thursday posted for hearing on February 17 the plea of AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi seeking enforcement of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, which preserves the character of religious places as they existed on August 15, 1947.
Reacting to the recent developments in the Sambhal issue, Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain on Monday said that the district administration of Sambhal has discovered a temple which was closed for 46 years and that proves that Sambhal is a pilgrimage site.
After the Supreme Court decision on the Places of Worship (Special Provision) Act 1991, Advocate Hari Shankar Jain on Friday said that he has pledged to reclaim all the Hindu temples which have been broken to build mosques.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Thursday welcomed the Supreme Court's interim order on the Places of Worship Act, 1991. In its ruling, the apex court imposed restrictions on registering new suits, delivering effective or final judgments, or ordering surveys in ongoing