Former litigant in the Ram Janmabhoomi vs Babri Masjid Case, Iqbal Ansari, on Tuesday, backed Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's jibe at the "opportunists" who he believes only remember Lord Ram's name in time of crisis.
The court's direction followed a petition filed by advocate Arpit Bhargava, which highlighted the persistent problem of limited or non-existent internet connectivity in court premises across Delhi. Advocate Beenashaw N Soni appeared for the petitioner.
The Delhi High Court has found that the petitioner had repeatedly misused the judicial process by filing multiple writ petitions against alleged unauthorised constructions without pursuing them to their logical end, holding that the conduct pointed to oblique and non-bona fide motives.
The matter was taken up by Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, with Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi appearing for the actor. At the beginning of the hearing, the Court asked Sethi whether he was aware of earlier judicial directions requiring litigants to exhaust statutory remedies before ap
A former litigant in the Babri Masjid case, Iqbal Ansari, has filed his SIR (Special Intensive Revision) form in Ayodhya, highlighting growing awareness among residents about the ongoing voter-verification exercise. Speaking to ANI, Ansari said that the people of Ayodhya are vigilant and
Prime Minister Narendra Modi will hoist the sacred flag atop the 191-foot-high shikhara of the Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi Temple during a special flag-hoisting ceremony today.
Meanwhile, a cleanliness drive was launched in Ayodhya ahead of the flag-hoisting ceremony at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple, scheduled for November 25.
Justice Kant also described mediation, an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, as "a game changer" capable of providing faster, off-court settlements to litigants.
Former litigant in the Ayodhya land dispute case, Iqbal Ansari, on Thursday expressed satisfaction over the completion of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple and welcomed the flag-hoisting ceremony taking place at the sacred site.
Justice Saurabh Banerjee observed that the petitioners had made "flimsy, misleading and mythical assertions" against a sitting trial court judge without any credible material to substantiate their claims.
The Delhi High Court has taken a stern view of repeated contemptuous allegations made against the judiciary and has directed that criminal contempt proceedings be initiated against a litigant.
As the alert spread, all benches of the High Court rose immediately, and lawyers, litigants, and staff were evacuated from the premises. The sudden evacuation created scenes of chaos, with people rushing out of the court complex in fear.