ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
Politics

'What's the need of ordinance? We'll wait for court's decision'

Ayodhya (Uttar Pradesh) [India], Nov 29 (ANI): Reacting to yoga guru Baba Ramdev's statement seeking an ordinance for construction of Ram Temple in Ayodhya, Nimrohi Akhara head Mahant Dinendra Das has questioned it, while also stating that they will wait for the final decision by the Supreme Court.

ANI Nov 29, 2018 12:18 IST googleads

Nimrohi Akhara head Mahant Dinendra Das speaking on Ayodhya issue

Ayodhya (Uttar Pradesh) [India], Nov 29 (ANI): Reacting to yoga guru Baba Ramdev's statement seeking an ordinance for construction of Ram Temple in Ayodhya, Nimrohi Akhara head Mahant Dinendra Das has questioned it, while also stating that they will wait for the final decision by the Supreme Court.
"What is the need of bringing in an ordinance? The matter is being heard by the court. A political angle should not be given over this. Whatever decision will be taken by the court, it would be final. We will wait for the court's decision," Das said, while speaking to ANI.
On Tuesday, Ramdev said that people will lose trust in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) if the Ram temple is not constructed in Ayodhya. He asserted that an ordinance in this regard is the only option left with the central government.
"BJP is in power in the state (Uttarakhand) and Centre. Still, if Ram temple is not constructed then people will lose trust in BJP. So, it will not be in the interest of BJP or India. 'Kar sevaks' (volunteers) cannot start its construction as it would be contempt of court. Ordinance is the only option," Ramdev had told reporters in Haridwar.
His statement comes days after Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and Shiv Sena organised events at various places in Ayodhya, Nagpur, and Bengaluru to gain support for the construction of the temple in Ayodhya and mount pressure on the central government to facilitate its construction, a matter currently sub-judice in the top court.
On October 29, the Supreme Court had adjourned the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit till January 2019 to fix the next hearing date in the matter, challenging the Allahabad High Court ruling of 2010.
The Allahabad High Court in its 2010 verdict had suggested the division of the disputed land in Ayodhya, one for each of the parties -- Nirmohi Akhara, Sunni Waqf Board and Ram Lalla.
It is believed that the Babri Masjid, which was built by Mughal emperor Babur in Ayodhya in 1528, was allegedly demolished by Hindu activists on December 6, 1992, who claimed that the mosque was built after demolishing a Ram temple that stood there. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

A bench of Justices R Mahadevan and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha delivered the ruling while dismissing civil appeals filed by the Central government - Ministry of Personnel and Training (MoPT) challenging judgments which had granted relief to certain OBC candidates in the Civil Services Examination.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

Pawan Bishnoi was allegedly booked in connection with arranging a Bolero car used in the shooting that killed Moosewala, while Jagtar Singh was booked on a separate ground, along with more than 20 others, in the high-profile murder case.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
General News

Dubey submits notice to LS Speaker

Dubey submits notice to LS Speaker

Speaking to reporters, Dubey said that Parliament is not a "canteen" and questioned the conduct during a protest meant to highlight issues faced by the public. He stated that the demonstration was intended to raise concerns about LPG shortages affecting common people and that the government would respond to those issues.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.