ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
Politics

"We never said no to SIR, but it shouldn't be done in a hurry": Tamil Nadu Minister S Regupathy

Speaking to reporters in Pudukkottai, Regupathy said, "We didn't say there should be no SIR. We only said it shouldn't be done in a hurry. It should be undertaken carefully after the 2026 elections to ensure that no voter's name is missed out."

ANI Nov 04, 2025 08:01 IST googleads

Tamil Nadu Minister S Regupathy addressing the media. (File Photo/ANI)

Pudukkottai (Tamil Nadu) [India], November 4 (ANI): Tamil Nadu Minister for Law and Natural Resources S Regupathy on Monday clarified that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) has not opposed the Statewide Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls, but only urged that the process should not be carried out in haste.
Speaking to reporters in Pudukkottai, Regupathy said, "We didn't say there should be no SIR. We only said it shouldn't be done in a hurry. It should be undertaken carefully after the 2026 elections to ensure that no voter's name is missed out."
He alleged that some political parties were "daydreaming" that the DMK's strong vote base could be reduced by using the SIR process to identify and remove voters from DMK-dominated areas. "That will never happen," he said, adding that the party would present this argument before the Supreme Court.
The minister further warned that deleting genuine voters from the list would be dangerous. "We only expressed our concern that real voters should not be deleted -- as happened in Bihar," he said. Regupathy reiterated that the DMK had no reason to include fake voters in the electoral rolls.
"We are only concerned that genuine voters should not be removed. People trust the DMK, and no matter how many allegations are made, they will vote for us. Minister K N Nehru will win his constituency by a huge margin -- both the BJP and the AIADMK know this," he said.
Tamil Nadu's ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) on Monday moved the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutional validity of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the Electoral Roll and seeking quashing of the October 27 notification of the Election Commission of India (ECI).
It challenged the ECI's orders dated June 24 and October 27, which directed the conduct of SIR.
The SIR and the EC orders, if not set aside, can "arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of voters" from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country, which are part of the basic structure of the Constitution, said the petition filed by DMK's Organising Secretary RS Bharathi.
The plea sought the quashing of the notification on grounds of allegedly being in violation of Articles 14, 19, 21, 325, and 326 of the Constitution of India, as well as provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.
The documentation requirements of the directive, lack of due process, as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said SIR of the Electoral Roll in the state of Tamil Nadu, make this exercise bound to result in the removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls, leading to their disenfranchisement, the plea alleged.
"A Special Summary Revision (SSR) was conducted in the state of Tamil Nadu between October 2024 and January 6, 2025, which addressed issues such as migration, death and deletion of ineligible voters. Existing electoral roll in Tamil Nadu was updated and published on January 6, 2025, under Special Summary Revision and has been continuously updated since then," it added.
It further said that it is a clear case of constitutional overreach as Article 324 of the Constitution of India, while vesting ECI with superintendence and control over elections, operates only in fields unoccupied by legislation.
According to orders dated October 27 and June 24, the ECI seeks to supplant the existing statutory framework, which already governs the preparation and revision of electoral rolls, the poll panel stated.
Last month, the ECI announced that it would conduct the second phase of SIR across 12 states and Union Territories, with the final voter list to be published on February 7, 2026. The first phase of the SIR was completed in Bihar ahead of the assembly polls.
The upcoming phase will cover Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Chhattisgarh, Goa, Gujarat, Kerala, Lakshadweep, Madhya Pradesh, Puducherry, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

A bench of Justices R Mahadevan and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha delivered the ruling while dismissing civil appeals filed by the Central government - Ministry of Personnel and Training (MoPT) challenging judgments which had granted relief to certain OBC candidates in the Civil Services Examination.

Read More
General News

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

The attached properties are in the form of land parcels situated in Goa, Kerala, Karnataka, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Delhi, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

Pawan Bishnoi was allegedly booked in connection with arranging a Bolero car used in the shooting that killed Moosewala, while Jagtar Singh was booked on a separate ground, along with more than 20 others, in the high-profile murder case.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.