ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

Uncivilised, heartless crime of acid attack doesn't deserve any clemency: SC

New Delhi (India) March 19 (ANI): The uncivilised and heartless crime of acid attack does not deserve any kind of clemency, the Supreme Court has said while enhancing the compensation to be paid to a victim by two convicts.

ANI Mar 19, 2019 15:07 IST googleads

The Supreme Court of India (File Photo)

New Delhi (India) March 19 (ANI): The uncivilised and heartless crime of acid attack does not deserve any kind of clemency, the Supreme Court has said while enhancing the compensation to be paid to a victim by two convicts.
A division bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi directed the convicts to pay Rs. 1,50,000 each to the victim, modifying the verdict of the Himachal Pradesh High Court which had imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 each on both of them that they had deposited.
The bench said, "This court cannot be oblivious of the situation that the victim must have suffered an emotional distress which cannot be compensated either by sentencing the accused or by grant of any compensation."
"Indeed, it cannot be ruled out that in the present case the victim had suffered an uncivilized and heartless crime committed by the respondents and there is no room for leniency which can be conceived. A crime of this nature does not deserve any kind of clemency,” the apex court noted in its verdict last week.
“We consider it appropriate to observe that both the accused shall pay the additional compensation of Rs. 1,50,000 each and the State of Himachal Pradesh shall pay the compensation as admissible under the Victim Compensation Scheme as in vogue to the acid victim. If the accused does not pay the additional compensation amount of Rs. 1,50,000 each within six months, the defaulting accused shall suffer rigorous imprisonment of six months,” it said.
While enhancing the compensation amount, the top court upheld the high court’s March 24, 2008 order of convicting them under Section 326 of IPC (voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means) and sentencing them to five years imprisonment, which they have already completed.
The trial court by its November 30, 2005 order convicted them under section 307/34 (attempt to murder with common intention) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and awarded 10 years jail terms with a fine of Rs. 5,000 each.
After the trial court's order, the convicts had approached the high court, which convicted them under section 326 of IPC with five years jail term and increased the fine. The state then moved the apex court against the high court order.
As per the prosecution, the victim was on her way to her college on July 12, 2004 when two men came on a scooter and threw some acid on her from a jug and ran away. Following which she was taken to the hospital by a nearby resident and a case was registered against the accused. The doctor's report said the chemical caused the victim 16 per cent burns. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

A bench of Justices R Mahadevan and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha delivered the ruling while dismissing civil appeals filed by the Central government - Ministry of Personnel and Training (MoPT) challenging judgments which had granted relief to certain OBC candidates in the Civil Services Examination.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

Pawan Bishnoi was allegedly booked in connection with arranging a Bolero car used in the shooting that killed Moosewala, while Jagtar Singh was booked on a separate ground, along with more than 20 others, in the high-profile murder case.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
General News

Shinde on bomb threat emails to blow BSE, Vidhan Bhavan

Shinde on bomb threat emails to blow BSE, Vidhan Bhavan

Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde stated that the threats were bogus, calling the Vidhan Bhavan safe and added that operations to tackle the issue are underway smoothly.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.