ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

Supreme Court exempts couples from Surrogacy Act age-bar if procedure began before Jan 2022

The Supreme Court has ruled that the age-bar under the Surrogacy Act will not apply to married couples who commenced the surrogacy procedure by creating and freezing embryos before the Act came into force in January 2022.

ANI Oct 10, 2025 05:43 IST googleads

Supreme Court of India (File Photo/ANI)

New Delhi [India], October 10 (ANI): The Supreme Court has ruled that the age restrictions under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act will not apply to married couples who commenced the surrogacy procedure by creating and freezing embryos before the Act came into force in January 2022.
A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and KV Vishwanathan reasoned that when intending couples had commenced the surrogacy procedure prior to the enforcement of the Act, their constitutional right to have a surrogate child cannot be frustrated by giving a retrospective effect to the law.
"The intending couples have a constitutional right which was unfettered when they commenced the process of surrogacy. The same can be curtailed only by reasonable restrictions and by not interpreting the Act unfairly, so as to completely curtail their constitutional right to surrogacy which was unfettered by the Act not giving a retrospective or even a retroactive effect to the Act under consideration", the apex court observed.
The Court was hearing three pleas challenging the age-related restriction in the Surrogacy Act, which was enforced while they had already commenced the surrogacy procedure.
As per the Act, a married couple would not be eligible to undertake a surrogacy procedure if the female is above 50 years of age and the male is above 55 years of age on the date of certification.
After considering the submissions, the Court held that since there was no age restriction when the couple commenced the surrogacy procedure, the enforcement of the Act while they were at a crucial stage of the process could not be applied retrospectively.
The Court thus ruled that the age restrictions under Section 4(iii)(c)(I) of the Surrogacy Act do not apply to couples who had already begun the surrogacy process before the Act came into force on 25 January 2022 and were at the stage of embryo creation, freezing or about to transfer embryos to the surrogate.
The Court clarified that it was not ruling on the validity of the age restrictions themselves, only their non-retrospective application.
Accordingly, the petitions were allowed, and the couples were exempted from meeting the age requirement to continue their surrogacy procedures. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

A bench of Justices R Mahadevan and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha delivered the ruling while dismissing civil appeals filed by the Central government - Ministry of Personnel and Training (MoPT) challenging judgments which had granted relief to certain OBC candidates in the Civil Services Examination.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

Pawan Bishnoi was allegedly booked in connection with arranging a Bolero car used in the shooting that killed Moosewala, while Jagtar Singh was booked on a separate ground, along with more than 20 others, in the high-profile murder case.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
General News

Shinde on bomb threat emails to blow BSE, Vidhan Bhavan

Shinde on bomb threat emails to blow BSE, Vidhan Bhavan

Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde stated that the threats were bogus, calling the Vidhan Bhavan safe and added that operations to tackle the issue are underway smoothly.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.