ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

SC verdict on Adani-Hindenburg issue is disappointing: CPI (M)

The Communist Party of India-Marxist has termed the Supreme Court verdict on the Adani-Hindenburg issue as "disappointing" and alleged that SEBI has "not been fulfilling its mandate for expeditiously probing" allegations against the Adani group

ANI Jan 03, 2024 21:39 IST googleads

Representative image (Photo source: @cpimspeak)

New Delhi [India], January 3 (ANI): The Communist Party of India-Marxist has termed the Supreme Court verdict on the Adani-Hindenburg issue as "disappointing" and alleged that
SEBI has "not been fulfilling its mandate for expeditiously probing" allegations against the Adani group.
CPI-M politburo said in a statement that the SEBI had changed its own rules, making them more opaque and the court had not questioned it on "not acting" on complaints it received.
"The Supreme Court judgement in the Adani case rejecting petitions for an impartial probe is disappointing and unfortunate on several grounds. A statutory body like the SEBI has not been fulfilling its mandate for expeditiously probing allegations against the Adani group," it said.
"In 2014, the DRI had made a reference to SEBI on a direct charge against Adani. In 2021,
Parliament had been informed that the SEBI had been probing allegations against Adani but in its affidavit to the Court, the SEBI denied such a probe. It is surprising that the Court took such a denial at its face value without questioning why the SEBI has not acted on the complaints," it added.
The statement said SEBI had "changed its own rules, making them more opaque, and to
conceal who the ultimate beneficiary is."
"The Expert Committee set up by the Supreme Court had itself stated that 'SEBI's pursuit of investigations is based on the premise that it is pursuing the 'spirit of the law', which
flies in the face of the prospective amendments with deferred effect that SEBI has made on the legislative side'. However the Supreme Court has given approval to these amendments, which admittedly act as a wall to conceal identities of the links of foreign investors with the 'ultimate
beneficiary'," CPI(M) said.
"It is most unfortunate that the judgement has given an open licence to the government to probe whether Hindenburg Research's allegations 'ignored rules' and to take action accordingly, in other words to shoot the messenger, which would jeopardise all those media outlets which had published the Hindenburg report. The Supreme Court has not enhanced its credibility with this judgement," it added.
In a relief to the Adani group of companies, the Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to transfer the probe from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to a Special Investigation Team (SIT) or CBI into the Adani-Hindenburg issue over allegations of stock price manipulation by the Indian corporate giant.
A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, PS Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said the scope of power of the apex court to enter into the regulatory domain of SEBI is limited. It said the scope of judicial review is only to see whether any fundamental right has been violated. The SC said the facts of the case do not warrant the transfer of the probe to the SIT or other agency.
The SC also said there was no material to doubt the investigation carried out by the SEBI. The verdict of the top court came on a batch of petitions seeking a court-monitored investigation or CBI probe into the allegations made by US-based firm Hindenburg Research against the Adani group of companies regarding violations of the stock market.
The bench said there has been no regulatory failure by SEBI and the market regulator cannot be expected to carry on its functions based on press reports though such reports can act as inputs for SEBI. The top court asked SEBI to complete within three months its probe into two cases pending out of 24 cases. The case is related to the allegations (part of a report by short-seller Hindenberg Research) that Adani had inflated its share prices.
After these allegations were published, it led to a sharp fall in the share value of various Adani companies, reportedly to the tune of USD 100 billion. The Adani Group has dismissed the charges as lies, saying it complies with all laws and disclosure requirements.
Various petitions were filed alleging that changes to the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act (SEBI) had provided a shield and an excuse for the Adani Group's regulatory contraventions and market manipulations to remain undetected.
The apex court then asked SEBI to independently probe the matter and also constituted an expert committee headed by retired Supreme Court judge Justice AM Sapre to look into the matter. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

The attached properties are in the form of land parcels situated in Goa, Kerala, Karnataka, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Delhi, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

Pawan Bishnoi was allegedly booked in connection with arranging a Bolero car used in the shooting that killed Moosewala, while Jagtar Singh was booked on a separate ground, along with more than 20 others, in the high-profile murder case.

Read More
General News

ED challenges interim bail granted to Jawad Ahmed Siddique

ED challenges interim bail granted to Jawad Ahmed Siddique

ED has challenged the interim bail granted to Jawad Ahmed Siddique in a money laundering case. He was granted interim bail by the Saket court on the grounds of his wife's medical condition.

Read More
General News

Accused in Farooq Abdullah firing case sent to 5-day custody

Accused in Farooq Abdullah firing case sent to 5-day custody

Counsel for the accused, Arvind Singh, expressed opposition to the police remand. He stated that a weapon had already been recovered in the matter and that the probe was nearing completion, as eyewitnesses had already been recorded.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.