ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

SC defers 'Udaipur Files' hearing to July 21, directs Centre to swiftly decide on release and certification

The Supreme Court on Wednesday stated that the matter will be decided by the Central government as a revision plea against the films' release is pending before the Central committee on a plea filed by one of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal Murder case against the release of the film "Udaipur Files".

ANI Jul 16, 2025 14:17 IST googleads

Supreme Court of India (Photo/ANI)

New Delhi [India], July 16 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered that the issue over the release and certification of the film 'Udaipur Files' will be decided by a committee constituted by the Central government today in the afternoon.
The top court said that the issue over the release and certification of the film will be decided by the committee at 2:30 pm today.
The Court directed the said Central committee to decide the issue immediately and deferred the matter to be heard again on Monday before itself.
"The Competent Authority (of the Central government) has taken cognisance of the revision petition over the release of the film pending before it and will be heard at 2:30 pm today, a bench led by Justice Surya Kant stated, deferring to hear the matter on merits on a later date - July 21, Monday.
"Having regard to the nature of the proceedings, we expect that the committee constituted by the CG will decide the revision petition immediately without delay. Post the matter for further consideration on Monday", the Court stated in its order.
The Court also permitted the accused in the matter, Mohammad Jawed, to appear before the Central committee and directed the committee to accord him a fair hearing over his inhibitions on being able to receive a fair trial in the murder case.
"In this regard, we also permit Mohammad Javed, the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal Murder case, to enter an appearance before the Central government. We direct the committee to accord a hearing to the accused as well," the Court stated in its order.
The counsel appearing for the producers of the film also informed the Court that the producers of the film and the son of the deceased Kanhaiya Lal are receiving death threats from certain people.
Following this submission, the Court granted liberty to the said producer and the son to approach the Superintendent of Police (SP) in their respective jurisdiction seeking protection.
Following this submission, the Court granted liberty to the said producer and the son to approach the Superintendent of Police (SP) in their respective jurisdiction seeking protection.
The Court also directed the SP to assess the alleged threat perception and directed necessary steps to be taken to ensure no harm is done in case any merit is found on the issue.
The Court was hearing a plea filed against the release of the film "Udaipur Files" by one Mohammad Javed, one of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal Murder case.
During the hearing today, the counsel appearing for the makers of 'Udaipur Files', Senior Advocate Gaurab Bhatia, vehemently argued that the matter be decided by the Supreme Court, as the stay on its release is causing major losses to the producers and is in violation of their fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression.
The Senior counsels, Kapil Sibal and Maneka Guruswamy, appearing for the petitioners (Maulana Arshad Madni of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind and an accused in the case, one Jawed, respectively challenging the release and certification of the movie, argued that the release would cause irreversible prejudice to the accused and influence his right to a fair trial.
It was also argued by the petitioners that the said film has completely vilified the Muslim community and is a complete desecration of the case.
"Once I saw the movie, I was shaken. If any judge were to see that, it is a complete thematic desecration of the case. It's the vilification of an entire community. Violence, homosexuality, denigration of women, and child abuse have been attributed to the community. It is unthinkable that a democratic nation will allow this movie to be certified.
Senior counsel Gaurav Bhatia, on the other hand, countered by stating that there was a beheading of a person in the matter. Videos were released both before the said offence and afterwards, and were also uploaded on Facebook. He stated that none of these persons-- the Senior counsels challenging the film -- came then (in defence of the deceased victim), Bhatia asserted, questioning their presence at the Court today challenging the film's release.
Bhatia stated further that radical elements have been removed from the movie, and how families (of the victim) have suffered is shown in the movie. Earlier, during the hearing,Bhatia had submitted that the filmmakers have incorporated all the 55 cuts that were directed by the CBFC. Only after those cuts, the film was certified for release, Bhatia added.
After hearing the arguments from both parties, the Court postponed the hearing to Monday and directed that in the meanwhile, the matter be decided by the Central government committee immediately. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

Politics

YSRCP files PIL challenging Andhra Pradesh govt’s land policy

YSRCP files PIL challenging Andhra Pradesh govt’s land policy

Former Andhra Pradesh Minister Gudivada Amarnath on Thursday said that the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the land policy of the state government, alleging that large extents of valuable public land are being allotted to a few real estate companies at very low prices.

Read More
General News

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

A bench of Justices R Mahadevan and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha delivered the ruling while dismissing civil appeals filed by the Central government - Ministry of Personnel and Training (MoPT) challenging judgments which had granted relief to certain OBC candidates in the Civil Services Examination.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

Pawan Bishnoi was allegedly booked in connection with arranging a Bolero car used in the shooting that killed Moosewala, while Jagtar Singh was booked on a separate ground, along with more than 20 others, in the high-profile murder case.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.