ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

Rahul Gandhi's remarks against Savarkar: SC extends stay on summons in case

A bench comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih adjourned the matter for four weeks and allowed the complainant, advocate Nripendra Pandey, to file his reply. The bench also permitted Gandhi to file a rejoinder within two weeks.

ANI Jul 25, 2025 14:41 IST googleads

Supreme Court of India

New Delhi [India], July 25 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Friday extended its interim order granting stay on summons issued against Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi for his controversial remarks against Vinayak Damodar Savarkar during 'Bharat Jodo Yatra' in 2022.
A bench comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih adjourned the matter for four weeks and allowed the complainant, advocate Nripendra Pandey, to file his reply. The bench also permitted Gandhi to file a rejoinder within two weeks.
The Uttar Pradesh government has filed its affidavit in the case and said that the summoning order followed a thorough re-examination of the case file, statements, and investigation report, all supporting the allegations made against the Congress leader.
The affidavit read, "The Magistrate properly applied judicial mind to facts and evidence, determining a prima facie case under Sections 153-A and 505 IPC."
The government has claimed that there was a "deliberate spreading of hatred through pre-planned actions" by Gandhi, and thus, his appeal before the apex court must be dismissed.
It stated that the High Court's order, declining any relief to Rahul Gandhi, was justified and lawful. "The interference of this court is not warranted in the matter," affirmative of Uttar Pradesh government submitted while opposing Gandhi's plea against summons.
Leader of Opposition (LOP) Gandhi approached the apex court against the summons issued by the Lucknow court on a complaint by Pandey over his comments against Savarkar.
On April 25, 2025, the top court had stayed the trial court's order issuing summons against Gandhi, but had asked him to desist from making further derogatory remarks against the freedom fighters.
It had warned the Congress MP not to make controversial remarks against freedom fighters in future, else he would have to "face consequences"
Gandhi had approached the Supreme Court challenging an Allahabad High Court's April 4 order, which had refused to quash the summons issued to him by a Magistrate court for making remarks against Savarkar.
Gandhi was summoned by the court as an accused in December last year over his speech at a press conference, where he allegedly said that Savarkar was a servant of the British and that he took a pension from the British.
The High Court had orally remarked that a remedy is available to Gandhi to move before the Sessions Judge with a plea under Section 397 (review records of lower court) of the CrPC instead of moving the High Court.
Advocate Pandey filed a complaint claiming that Gandhi, with the intention of spreading hatred in the society, called Savarkar a servant of the British and that he took a pension from the British.
The summons order was passed by a Lucknow Magistrate court on December 12, 2024. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

Politics

Giriraj Singh slams Rahul Gandhi over conduct in Parliament

Giriraj Singh slams Rahul Gandhi over conduct in Parliament

Speaking to reporters here on Thursday, Singh said the opposition had sought permission to speak on the issue of LPG, but did not adhere to the subject.

Read More
Politics

YSRCP files PIL challenging Andhra Pradesh govt’s land policy

YSRCP files PIL challenging Andhra Pradesh govt’s land policy

Former Andhra Pradesh Minister Gudivada Amarnath on Thursday said that the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the land policy of the state government, alleging that large extents of valuable public land are being allotted to a few real estate companies at very low prices.

Read More
General News

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

A bench of Justices R Mahadevan and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha delivered the ruling while dismissing civil appeals filed by the Central government - Ministry of Personnel and Training (MoPT) challenging judgments which had granted relief to certain OBC candidates in the Civil Services Examination.

Read More
General News

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

The attached properties are in the form of land parcels situated in Goa, Kerala, Karnataka, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Delhi, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.