ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

Lockdown period will not affect limitation for expiry of provisional attachment order issued by ED, says Delhi HC on Surya Vinayak Industries case

New Delhi [India], November 24 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Tuesday views that the period of lockdown will not affect the time period for expiry for a provisional attachment order while staying the provisional attachment order in the Rs 2240 crore bank fraud case involving Surya Vinayak Industries.

ANI Nov 24, 2020 22:56 IST googleads

Representative Image

New Delhi [India], November 24 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Tuesday views that the period of lockdown will not affect the time period for expiry for a provisional attachment order while staying the provisional attachment order in the Rs 2240 crore bank fraud case involving Surya Vinayak Industries.
The Court further posted the proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority till the next date of hearing on December 24.
Justice Navin Chawla's directions come during the hearing of two petitions filed by Nidhi Jain and Mohan Gupta seeking to set aside the provisional attachment order issued by ED. The matter relates to Rs 2240 crore bank fraud case involving Surya Vinayak Industries.
The petitioner was represented by Advocates Vijay Aggarwal and Ashul Agarwal. It was argued that the court would never tolerate an indolent litigant since delay defeats equity. "Vigilantibus non-dormientibus jura subveniunt" which means law assists those who are vigilant and not those who are indolent. It was argued that lapse of time is a species forfeiture of a right.
Advocate Aggarwal argued that the Constitutional Right of the Petitioners under Article 300A has been infringed and the provisional attachment order and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom as the Adjudicating Authority are liable to be set aside as the provisional attachment order has not been confirmed even after expiry of 180 days and after the expiry of 180 days, the Adjudicating Authority has become functus officio.
Lawyers for petitioners further argued that Sub-section (3) of Section 5 to the Act provides that every Provisional Attachment Order passed under sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Act, shall cease to have effect after the expiry of the period of one hundred and eighty days or on the date of the order made under sub-section (3) of Section 8, "whichever is earlier".
Therefore, one hundred and eighty days from the date of the order passed under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Act, is the outer limit of the validity/life of such order and the same ceases to remain in effect, by efflux of time, beyond that date, in case no order confirming the Provisional Attachment Order is passed by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (3) of Section 8 of the Act prior thereto. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

Woman found dead in hotel room in North Delhi

Woman found dead in hotel room in North Delhi

According to Delhi Police, around 12:30 am, staff of Prince Hotel located at SPM T-point on Church Mission Road informed the beat staff that Room No. 205 was locked and the guest inside was not responding despite repeated knocking.

Read More
General News

FCI workers' demands raised before Labour Authority

FCI workers' demands raised before Labour Authority

The ongoing dispute between the management of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and its sole recognised union, Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karamchari Sangh (BKNKS), was taken up for conciliation on Thursday before the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) in New Delhi.

Read More
General News

Fire breaks out at Sheikh Sarai Transport Authority record room

Fire breaks out at Sheikh Sarai Transport Authority record room

A fire broke out at the old Transport Authority building in Sheikh Sarai Phase 2 area of Delhi on Wednesday night, gutting important documents stored in the record room, officials said.

Read More
General News

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

The attached properties are in the form of land parcels situated in Goa, Kerala, Karnataka, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Delhi, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.