ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

Delhi High Court slams schools for using 'Bouncers' in fee disputes

The court emphasised that educational institutions have a greater purpose beyond commercial interests, including promoting public welfare and nation-building. It stated that such practices foster fear, humiliation, and exclusion, which contradicts the foundational principles of education.

ANI Jun 05, 2025 18:29 IST googleads

Representative Image

New Delhi [India], June 5 (ANI): The Delhi High Court has strongly condemned schools for employing "bouncers" to coerce students and parents over unpaid fees. The court ruled that such actions amount to mental harassment and undermine a child's psychological well-being and self-worth.
The court emphasised that educational institutions have a greater purpose beyond commercial interests, including promoting public welfare and nation-building. It stated that such practices foster fear, humiliation, and exclusion, which contradicts the foundational principles of education.
Earlier today, Delhi Public School (DPS) Dwarka informed the High Court that it had withdrawn its decision to suspend 31 students due to unpaid fees. However, Justice Sachin Datta emphasised that while schools charge fees for their services, they must not operate purely as commercial enterprises.
The court stressed the importance of protecting students' rights and dignity, particularly in fee disputes.
The court acknowledged the school's right to collect appropriate fees to sustain infrastructure, remunerate staff, and create a conducive learning environment. However, it stressed the institution's fiduciary and moral obligations toward students.
Justice Datta urged both DPS Dwarka and the parents to work together to resolve disputes in the best interests of the students.
In a recent ruling, another bench of the Delhi High Court granted relief to students of Delhi Public School (DPS), Dwarka, who had been removed from the rolls due to non-payment of increased fees.
Justice Vikas Mahajan, while hearing a petition filed by several parents, directed that the affected students be readmitted to classes, provided they deposit 50 per cent of the revised fee for the academic years 2024-25 and onward.
In the present matter, the parents had challenged the suspension, alleging discrimination by school authorities. They claimed the students had been rusticated due to non-payment of revised fees.
DPS Dwarka argued that parents had been repeatedly informed about outstanding dues, citing the school's financial strain. It defended its use of security personnel, citing protests, alleged threats, and concerns over potential student abductions.
The parents refuted these claims, stating that students' rights must be protected and accusing the school of withholding key documents.
Parents alleged that the school arbitrarily removed students without prior notice, violating court directives and fundamental principles of justice.
Many of the expelled students are in Class X and had begun preparing for board exams, making their removal particularly disruptive to their education and emotional well-being.
Further allegations include claims of student mistreatment, threats by security personnel, and confinement in a bus for two hours before being sent home.
Reports indicate increased security, including female bouncers, on May 14, 2025. Parents asserted that local authorities had declined to intervene, citing the matter's sub-judice status.
The parents' plea came in response to DPS Dwarka's challenge against a directive from the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) on July 18, 2024, which ordered the police to file an FIR against the school.
The directive cited complaints of student expulsions, public disclosure of names on the school website, and an alleged incident involving a female student being denied assistance during menstruation. The High Court later stayed this order on July 30.
Last month, the Delhi High Court issued a stern rebuke against the school over claims that students were confined in the library and barred from classes due to unpaid fees. The court labelled the actions "inhumane," likening the institution to a commercial entity rather than an educational one.
The judge suggested that the principal could face criminal prosecution for the alleged mistreatment of students. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

Woman found dead in hotel room in North Delhi

Woman found dead in hotel room in North Delhi

According to Delhi Police, around 12:30 am, staff of Prince Hotel located at SPM T-point on Church Mission Road informed the beat staff that Room No. 205 was locked and the guest inside was not responding despite repeated knocking.

Read More
General News

FCI workers' demands raised before Labour Authority

FCI workers' demands raised before Labour Authority

The ongoing dispute between the management of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and its sole recognised union, Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karamchari Sangh (BKNKS), was taken up for conciliation on Thursday before the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) in New Delhi.

Read More
General News

Fire breaks out at Sheikh Sarai Transport Authority record room

Fire breaks out at Sheikh Sarai Transport Authority record room

A fire broke out at the old Transport Authority building in Sheikh Sarai Phase 2 area of Delhi on Wednesday night, gutting important documents stored in the record room, officials said.

Read More
General News

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

The attached properties are in the form of land parcels situated in Goa, Kerala, Karnataka, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Delhi, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.