ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

Court sets aside order of FIR against a serving judge

A sessions court in Rohini has set aside an order for a magistrate to direct the police to register an FIR against a serving judge and a businessman for the alleged offences of extortion and false theft insurance claim.

ANI Feb 19, 2025 05:43 IST googleads

Representative image

New Delhi [India], February 19 (ANI): A sessions court in Rohini has set aside an order for a magistrate to direct the police to register an FIR against a serving judge and a businessman for the alleged offences of extortion and false theft insurance claim.
While setting aside the order, the sessions court referred to a Supreme Court judgement, which held, "The magistrate is not supposed to act merely as a post office and needs to adopt a judicial approach while considering an application seeking investigation by the police."
In May 2024, a magistrate court had passed an order to register a FIR against Judge Ajay Goel and a businessman. Both had challenged the order of FIR.
" There can be no registration of FIR against a judicial officer without seeking the permission of the Chief Justice of High Court which is lacking in the present case," ASJ Jagmohan said in the order passed on February 12.
Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Jagmohan Singh set aside the order of FIR on February 12.
"There can be no registration of FIR against a judicial officer without seeking the permission of the Chief Justice of High Court, which is lacking in the present case," ASJ Jagmohan Singh said while passing the order.
The court said that the impugned order can not be sustained and is hereby set aside. Both the present revision petitions are allowed.
However, the court has clarified that the complainants are at liberty to lead pre-summoning evidence in the matter before the trial court.
In an order passed on May 21, 2024, Metropolitan Magistrate passed an order on application and observed, "From a perusal of the record of the case collected, it appears that a proper investigation can only be conducted by verifying the telephone conversation between the parties and getting the same verified from FSL, which is beyond the reach of the complainant. Thus, since the evidence required to be collected is aging out, the truth will certainly not be within the reach of the applicant; applications under section 156(3) CrPC stand allowed." (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

A bench of Justices R Mahadevan and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha delivered the ruling while dismissing civil appeals filed by the Central government - Ministry of Personnel and Training (MoPT) challenging judgments which had granted relief to certain OBC candidates in the Civil Services Examination.

Read More
General News

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

The attached properties are in the form of land parcels situated in Goa, Kerala, Karnataka, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Delhi, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

Pawan Bishnoi was allegedly booked in connection with arranging a Bolero car used in the shooting that killed Moosewala, while Jagtar Singh was booked on a separate ground, along with more than 20 others, in the high-profile murder case.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.