ADD ANI AS A TRUSTED SOURCE
googleads
Menu
General News

Court Issues show cause notice to investigating officers in acid attack case for lapse in evidence handling

In an acid attack case, the Rohini court of Delhi observed that despite the presence of acid stains on the mattress of the bed where the victim was sitting at the time of the incident, the first Investigating Officer failed to seize the mattress.

ANI Dec 17, 2024 13:12 IST googleads

Representative Image

New Delhi [India], December 17 (ANI): In an acid attack case, the Rohini court of Delhi observed that despite the presence of acid stains on the mattress of the bed where the victim was sitting at the time of the incident, the first Investigating Officer failed to seize the mattress.
It was only at a later stage that the second Investigating Officer seized the mattress and the victim's saree.
The Rohini court of Delhi issued a show cause notice to both investigating officers and directed them to explain why departmental action should not be initiated against them for the serious lapse that led to the destruction of crucial evidence in the case.
Last week, during the hearing the court noted that one of the accused person had expired and directed the concerned Station house officer (SHO) to file a death verification report of that accused person. The Court now fixed the matter for February 28, 2024, for prosecution evidence.
Earlier, the same Court had denied bail to one of the accused who is the sister-in-law (Bhabhi) of the injured/acid attack victim and was earlier declared an absconder by the court for her absence for 6 years from the process of law.
Recently, the Court of Additional Sessions Judge Dhirendra Rana while passing an order, noted that the complainant had received severe injuries during the incident and there is permanent privation of one eye and has also become incapacitated in speaking partially due to the incident.
The matter was reported to the police without any delay and she was examined in a hospital after an hour or so of the incident. Her statement was recorded on June 27, 2018, wherein she categorically cast allegations against the present accused. It is also a matter of record that she was declared a proclaimed offender and was arrested only on February 21, 2024. The chargesheet though filed by the investigating officer is yet to be received by this court.
The family of the complainant has contemplated threat perception and it is argued that it would be difficult to secure the presence of the applicant during trial considering her previous conduct, noted the Court.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, previous conduct of the accused and the injuries suffered by the complainant, I am not inclined to release the accused/applicant on bail. Hence, the application for grant of bail moved on behalf of the accused is hereby dismissed, said the court.
The court noted further that the accused was never arrested by police and she had been absconding since 2018.
Advocate Aditi Drall appeared for the complainant and opposed the bail plea and argued that as per the MLC, during the incident the injured was seriously injured and lost one eye forever. Due to the incident, she has also become partially speech impaired. Advocate Aditi Drall further argued that accused Ruby was earlier declared proclaimed offender and the possibility of her fleeing away from the trial cannot be ruled out further her HIV condition is not license to commit crime. Moreover, co-accused are still absconding.
The counsel for the accused argued that the accused was not aware of the proceedings against her and she was arrested from her sister's house on February 21, 2024.
It is further submitted that to falsely implicate the accused persons in the present case, the complainant herself poured acid on her and to take revenge on the family members, she made false allegations against the accused persons.
The investigation of the present case has been completely evaded and he has been sent to jail on February 21, 2024. Moreover, the applicant is an HIV patient and is undergoing treatment for the same. According to the prosecution on June 17, 2018, at about 9 am when the victim was present at home her mother-in-law and sister-in-law with the help of other accused persons started to strangle her. Further, her uncle captured her hair and her husband poured some acidic substance into her mouth. The victim made a phone call to her brother and called the police. Thereafter an FIR was lodged by police against the accused persons at Shahbad Dairy Police Station, the counsel said. (ANI)

Get the App

What to Read Next

General News

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

Creamy layer cannot be decided on parents income alone: SC

A bench of Justices R Mahadevan and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha delivered the ruling while dismissing civil appeals filed by the Central government - Ministry of Personnel and Training (MoPT) challenging judgments which had granted relief to certain OBC candidates in the Civil Services Examination.

Read More
General News

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

ED attaches 31 immovable properties worth Rs 581.65 crore in...

The attached properties are in the form of land parcels situated in Goa, Kerala, Karnataka, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Delhi, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

SC grants bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case

In 2019, Shah was arrested in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against him and other separatist leaders in 2017. The separatist leader has not been released from judicial custody ever since.

Read More
General News

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

SC grants bail to two accused in Siddhu Moosewala murder case

Pawan Bishnoi was allegedly booked in connection with arranging a Bolero car used in the shooting that killed Moosewala, while Jagtar Singh was booked on a separate ground, along with more than 20 others, in the high-profile murder case.

Read More
General News

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

Minor children's custody with mother not illegal: Delhi HC

he Delhi High court while disposing a Habeas Corpus petition held that Minor childrens' custody with mother, who is a natural guardian, can not be termed as illegal. A British Citizen of Pakistan origin Yasir Ayaz had moved a petition of Habeas Corpus for production of his children and their repatriation to the United Kingdom as per the order of UK Family court.

Read More
Home About Us Our Products Advertise Contact Us Terms & Condition Privacy Policy

Copyright © aninews.in | All Rights Reserved.